---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

---

In the initial stages of forex trading, the choice of brokerage platform directly determines a novice trader's financial security, trading experience, and long-term development foundation. However, this aspect is also the most vulnerable area for many new traders.

---

Over-reliance on third-party websites primarily focused on reviews is a common misconception among new traders when selecting platforms. These websites often present content under the guise of "objective reviews," "industry rankings," and "newbie recommendations," seemingly providing investors with a neutral reference. However, a deeper look into their operating logic reveals that their core profit model is deeply tied to "non-quality brokers." The "advantageous reviews" they produce are essentially marketing content driven by profiteering, rather than objective assessments based on the platform's true qualifications and service quality.
The operating mechanisms of these review websites reveal that their so-called "recommendations" and "favorable reviews" often stem from financial support from unknown, unqualified, and even non-compliant brokers. For brokers lacking market visibility, insufficient compliance credentials, or subpar service quality, conventional compliant marketing channels struggle to gain investor trust. Consequently, they partner with review sites, paying promotional fees and offering commissions in exchange for positive reviews like "high ratings" and "strong recommendations." These sites deliberately exaggerate minor advantages of their brokers (such as "low account opening threshold" and "high leverage") in their content creation, while avoiding key risks such as lack of compliance licenses, unclear regulatory information, severe trading slippage, and numerous withdrawal restrictions. They even compare and disparage non-compliant platforms, misleading newcomers into believing that high ratings equate to quality. Furthermore, these review sites are highly concealed advertising. They often package their content with claims of "real user experiences," "industry expert analysis," and "data comparison reports," minimizing any commercial overtones and making it difficult for inexperienced traders to discern the authenticity and objectivity of the information. For example, some websites fabricate "success stories of novice traders" to portray their partner brokers as the "top choice for beginners." They also use a "rating system" to rank compliant platforms lowest, without disclosing whether the ratings include the implicit metric of "promoting partnerships." This type of covert advertising, using reviews as a vehicle, circumvents regulatory restrictions on direct advertising while exploiting new traders' reliance on professional information, creating a marketing trap that appears to be guidance but is actually misleading.
For novice forex traders, when choosing a brokerage platform, it is essential to establish a screening process that prioritizes compliance and relies on objective data, completely eliminating reliance on review websites. First, prioritize verifying the broker's regulatory credentials—confirming whether it holds valid licenses from major regulators such as the UK FCA, the US NFA, and the Australian ASIC, and that the license status is in good working order (this can be verified on the regulator's official website). This is the primary guarantee for fund security. Second, independently verify the platform's core service capabilities, such as testing trading slippage and order execution speeds through a demo account, and consulting customer service to understand the withdrawal process and cycle, to avoid being misled by "false advantages" in reviews. Finally, you can obtain genuine feedback from other traders through authoritative industry forums (such as ForexFactory) and official social media groups of compliant brokers. However, be careful to discern the source of information to avoid falling into the "secondary advertising trap."
In short, when choosing a platform, forex beginners must be aware that review websites are not objective guides. The hidden profit chains behind them can lead to distorted information and, in turn, financial risks. Only by using "compliance verification," "independent verification," and "multi-party verification" as core screening principles can you avoid hidden advertising traps and choose a high-quality brokerage platform that truly suits you, laying a solid foundation for your subsequent trading practice.

Amid the ongoing evolution of the global forex market, forex traders must understand that the market liquidation of forex brokers will become the norm, and bankruptcies will gradually increase.

---

This trend is not accidental; it is the result of a combination of factors, including shifting market demand, intensified industry competition, flawed business models, and tightening external regulation. Especially in the context of the waning popularity of forex trading in recent decades, brokers' survival space is shrinking, significantly increasing their operational risks.
From the perspective of market demand, the popularity of foreign exchange trading has been declining in recent decades, directly leading to brokers facing a core dilemma: difficulty in acquiring clients. On the one hand, the rise of diversified investment products such as stocks, funds, and cryptocurrencies has expanded investors' capital allocation options, leading to an increasingly pronounced diversion of funds from the foreign exchange market. On the other hand, the inherently high leverage and high risk nature of foreign exchange trading, coupled with negative cases involving some non-compliant brokers in the past, has led to a decline in investor trust in the market and a continuous decline in the number of new clients entering the market. For most brokers, clients are the core source of revenue. When the client base falls below the operational break-even point, brokers face the financial dilemma of "not being able to cover expenses" – whether it's platform maintenance, labor costs, or regulatory compliance expenses, they all require a stable supply of client funds and trading commissions. Once the inflow of funds fails to cover costs, bankruptcy becomes inevitable.
From a business model perspective, most small and medium-sized foreign exchange brokers currently focus on "B-warehouse business" (i.e., internal hedging), serving retail traders with small capital. The operating logic of this model is to match and hedge retail investors' long and short orders within the platform, eliminating the need to place orders in the international foreign exchange market (known as the "A-position business"). This significantly reduces operational costs such as slippage and fees, while also generating profits through "taking advantage of spreads" and "earning commissions." However, this model presents significant risk vulnerabilities: when orders within the platform cannot be fully hedged (e.g., due to excessive order volume in one direction), brokers are forced to become the "direct counterparty" to retail investors, essentially making any profit for them a loss for the brokers. If a large number of retail investors profit in a short period of time, or if negative market news (such as regulatory penalties or concerns about fund security) triggers a concentrated withdrawal (bank run), the brokers' own capital reserves will be unable to cope, easily triggering a liquidity crisis, ultimately leading to the platform's closure and the inability to redeem investor funds.
Furthermore, the operating model of relying on agents to attract customers further exacerbates brokers' profit pressures and the risk of bankruptcy. With customer acquisition costs in the current forex market skyrocketing, most brokers are opting to partner with third-party agents, paying them high commissions (typically 30%-70% of client trading commissions) to recruit retail investors. While this model may appear to lower brokers' customer acquisition costs, it actually significantly squeezes their profit margins. Given limited client trading volume and meager spread income, commissions paid to agents often result in brokers failing to cover their costs, leading to chronic losses. Furthermore, some agents, driven by the desire for high commissions, may engage in non-compliant practices such as "inducing account openings" and "false advertising." If these practices trigger customer complaints or regulatory investigations, brokers face fines and license revocation, further accelerating their demise.
Based on industry trends, the wave of forex broker closures is essentially the inevitable result of the market's survival of the fittest. In the future, leading brokers with strong compliance credentials (such as holding top-tier regulatory licenses in multiple countries), sufficient capital reserves, and a diversified business model (such as catering to both institutional and retail clients and offering a wide range of trading services) will capture a larger market share. Small and medium-sized brokers that rely heavily on retail trading (B-warehousing) services, have a single profit model, and lack risk tolerance will be gradually eliminated due to declining market demand and competitive pressure. Forex traders should be aware of this trend and, when choosing a broker, not only verify its compliance but also its financial stability (such as capitalization and profitability) and business model (whether it relies too much on retail trading (B-warehousing) or agents) to avoid losing their funds due to platform failure.

In the two-way forex market, small-capital traders often prefer high-risk trading strategies over stable annualized returns.

---

The psychological motivations behind this phenomenon deserve further exploration. For small investors, achieving financial freedom is more challenging, so they are more willing to take risks in pursuit of rapid wealth growth. Even if they suffer losses after leveraging their capital, they believe such losses will not significantly impact their lives or life plans due to their limited capital. On the contrary, if their risks are successful and they achieve profits, they will be able to temporarily relieve stress and achieve a certain degree of financial comfort.
Forex brokers' preference for small investors is also noteworthy. Brokers tend to cater to the gambling mentality of small investors because these investors provide abundant liquidity to the market. Small investors often use high leverage, which makes them more vulnerable to stop-loss orders, losses, and even margin calls. According to industry insiders, small investors with less than $10,000 in capital are mostly B-position clients, meaning their trades are primarily hedged within the brokerage, creating a direct betting relationship with them. This model allows brokers to profit from these investors' losses.
In contrast, forex brokers have a completely different approach to large investors. Due to their ample funds, large investors generally do not use high leverage, or even no leverage at all, thus facing virtually no risk of margin calls. This makes it difficult for brokers to profit from their stop-loss orders, losses, or margin calls. Conversely, large investors may exploit the broker's platform to generate substantial profits, which, to some extent, makes brokers feel that their platforms are being used "free." Consequently, brokers are often cautious about large investors, even declining their deposit requests due to lengthy fund source verification processes. This phenomenon has become something of an unspoken rule in the forex investment industry.
In summary, the varying attitudes of brokers towards investors of varying fund sizes in the forex investment market reflect the complexity of market structure and trading psychology. The risk-taking mentality of small investors intersects with the profit-seeking behavior of brokers, while the cautious strategies of large investors conflict with the interests of brokers. This phenomenon not only reveals the inherent contradictions of the forex market but also provides important insights for investors and regulators.

In a two-way foreign exchange trading system, investors must first understand the core attributes of the underlying assets: foreign exchange currencies (specifically, mainstream global settlement currency pairs such as EUR/USD and USD/JPY) are inherently low-risk, low-return, and low-liquidity investment products.

---

This attribute is not a subjective judgment, but rather a combination of the pricing logic of the foreign exchange market, central bank intervention mechanisms, and the need for stability in the global financial system. It also aligns closely with the underlying principles of the "risk-return-liquidity" triangular balance in financial investment, profoundly influencing traders' strategic choices and risk management.
Based on the general principles of financial investment, there exists an unbreakable triangular balance between "risk-return-liquidity," and there is no such thing as a perfect investment product that offers "low risk, high return, and high liquidity." This principle is particularly evident in the foreign exchange market: if an asset class boasts high liquidity (such as stocks and cryptocurrencies), its price is susceptible to significant fluctuations due to market sentiment and capital flows, leading to increased risk and return. However, if an asset class pursues low risk (such as government bonds and bank deposits), this comes at the expense of returns and liquidity—either maintaining a low annualized return or imposing a fixed lock-up period that restricts withdrawals. As a fundamental settlement tool in the global financial system, foreign exchange (forex) serves international trade and cross-border capital flows, rather than providing high returns for investors. Therefore, it inherently possesses the attributes of "low risk, low return, and low liquidity." On the one hand, the price fluctuations of major currency pairs are strictly regulated by central banks, with daily fluctuations typically limited to 1%-2%, far lower than those of instruments like stocks and commodity futures. On the other hand, while forex trading can be conducted 24/7, large amounts (e.g., tens of millions of dollars) still incur liquidity costs such as widening spreads and delayed order execution when moving in and out. Furthermore, the annualized return (derived from the interest rate spread) from long-term holding of currency pairs is generally less than 5%, further underscoring its low return characteristics.
From the perspective of foreign exchange market trends, major global currency pairs have long been in a state of intense consolidation, a situation that directly limits the effectiveness of trend trading strategies. Central banks of major economies (such as the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Japan) actively control their currencies' exchange rates through monetary policy tools (such as interest rate adjustments, foreign exchange intervention, and quantitative easing). Their core goal is to maintain exchange rates within a narrow range. Excessively high exchange rates weaken export competitiveness, while excessively low exchange rates could trigger imported inflation and capital outflows. Therefore, central banks typically set a clear "target range" for exchange rates and intervene by selling or buying their own currency when the exchange rate reaches the boundaries of this range. For example, the Bank of Japan has long maintained the USD/JPY exchange rate within a range of 100-150. Even during the Federal Reserve's aggressive rate hikes, it intervened in the market to prevent the exchange rate from breaching critical thresholds. This persistent central bank intervention has made it difficult for the foreign exchange market to form sustained, clear trends over the past two decades. Most currency pairs have exhibited a "stagnant" pattern of range-bound fluctuations and back-and-forth movements. In this context, breakout trading strategies based on the core principle of "breaking through key points and following the trend extension" are virtually unprofitable. When prices break through resistance or support levels, they often experience a rapid pullback due to central bank intervention or profit-taking. This leads to frequent stop-loss triggering and a high probability of cumulative losses over the long term. Therefore, investors must abandon the misconception that the forex market exhibits clear trends and understand that forex currencies are range-bound instruments, not trending instruments.
Given the low-risk, low-return, and range-bound nature of forex currencies, traders must develop appropriate trading strategies while simultaneously addressing the challenges of greed and fear. First, in terms of position management, the approach of "heavy short-term trading" should be completely abandoned in favor of a "light long-term" strategy. Due to the limited volatility of foreign exchange currencies, heavy trading not only fails to maximize returns, but can trigger stop-loss orders even with small fluctuations. Light positions (e.g., a single commodity position of no more than 1%-2% of account funds) can withstand market fluctuations and provide a safety cushion for long-term investment. Second, in terms of strategy design, breakout trading methods should be avoided in favor of strategies that are suitable for consolidating markets, such as "buy low and sell high" (shorting at the upper limit of a currency pair's range and going long at the lower limit) and "moving average following" (using medium- to long-term moving averages, such as the 200-day moving average, as a trend reference, entering the market only when the price breaks slightly along the moving average, avoiding counter-trend trading). More crucially, from a mindset management perspective, while a light-weight, long-term strategy can mitigate risk, it still requires managing the impact of greed and fear. When prices rise slightly in the direction of the position held, generating unrealized profits, greed can easily lead to premature closing of the position, missing out on subsequent gains. When prices experience a pullback, resulting in unrealized losses, fear can easily lead to stop-loss exits, resulting in a "washout." A sophisticated investor's solution to this problem is to "lay out numerous light positions along the moving average." By spreading out entry points (e.g., building multiple small positions when the price retraces to the moving average), this reduces the risk of a single entry while allowing the position to accumulate as the price slowly moves along the moving average. This also avoids emotional fluctuations caused by large single unrealized profits or losses, ultimately achieving stable compound returns within the narrow market fluctuations.
In summary, the properties and market characteristics of foreign exchange currencies make them unsuitable for high-risk, high-return trading models. Investors should accept their inherent low-risk, low-return, and low-liquidity nature, abandoning breakout trading strategies and heavy short-term positions. Instead, they should balance risk and reward in two-way forex trading by adopting a light-weight, long-term strategy, adapting to consolidation strategies, and meticulous mindset management.

In two-way forex trading, traders with larger capital typically prioritize using forex bank platforms or brokers with liquidity provider (LP) qualifications and retail forex platforms. This selection strategy is based on a comprehensive consideration of capital security and trading efficiency.

---

Specifically, large-scale forex traders typically refer to those with capital of nearly one million or even several million US dollars. For such investors, entrusting such large sums of money to an unknown, unreputable, and small-scale forex broker is extremely unwise. In fact, the capital of a single large investor may already exceed the combined capabilities of some smaller forex brokers. In this case, choosing a broker with poor reputation or a small scale not only leads to higher operational risks but also may result in insufficient fund security.
In theory, forex traders with larger capital can build their own platforms and connect directly with liquidity providers (LPs). However, this approach presents numerous practical problems. First, building and maintaining a platform requires significant costs, including technical investment, operational maintenance, and compliance management. Second, forex trading is a highly specialized field. Investing limited time and energy in platform building and integration can distract investors from their core trading activities, potentially resulting in a loss of returns. Ultimately, professional matters should be left to professionals. This ensures efficient platform operation while allowing investors to focus on their investment decisions and risk management. Therefore, for forex traders with larger capital, a wiser choice is to prioritize forex bank platforms or brokers with liquidity provider (LP) qualifications and retail forex platforms. These platforms typically boast higher credibility, stronger financial strength, and more comprehensive trading systems and risk control mechanisms. By partnering with these platforms, large investors can not only ensure the security of their funds but also receive better trading services and more stable market liquidity, providing a solid foundation and strong support for their investment and trading activities.

---

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---